Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Be Very Afraid... Part Three in an October Series

Be very afraid; the healthcare market will no longer have competition. After dominating the market and putting the other insurance suppliers out of business, the government will know that, as the only option, they can do whatever they want. Well, I guess they've thought that for a long time, but let's not go there.

Obama is very scary. Here are the common Halloween emblems and how he reminds me of them:

Jack-o-lantern: grinning and dangerous.

Witch: constantly whipping up potions and conniving against others (unborn babies, the elderly - I mean, the rationably rationable).

Zombie: this term actually pertains more to his followers.

Black cat: don't let him cross your path. Now, before you say it, "black" has nothing to do with this. He's not black, anyway; he's bi-racial.

Graves: the ultimate outcome of the healthcare plan.

Right now I'm not concerned that the American people don't see him for who he is. Even if we did, he'd just go on doing whatever he wants. I admit I've been tricked by him, though maybe not in the way everyone else has. I thought he was just an ignorant, misguided guy who tries to please everyone and doesn't know what he's talking about. While I admit he doesn't know what he's talking about and he tries to please everyone, when he (and the rest of the Dems) want something done, it's done. They just sneak it in. Notice how the Senate bill does, in fact, have a public insurance option, though it is "unnecessary". He just said that so the right would chill. Well, if the guy who is one of the most liberal presidents ever is trying to please the right (proof that he is, in fact, a liberal, because they never know what they're doing), the left will get mad. And Obama will say, "Well, I didn't really mean it that way." And they'll be soothed by his hypnotic, "inspiring" voice just like everyone else. Speaking of which... those who find him inspiring (and I mean the ones that actually are inspired, not the ones who claim to be inspired but really just like him because he's black (the ones who call me racist)) are probably only hearing how he sounds. For instance, I think it's really lame how all Taylor Swift writes about is how her ex is a jerk, how she wishes she could be with this one guy, how someone else stole her guy, or how she loves this one guy. I mean, come on. Isn't there better stuff to write about? But I like the tunes to some of her songs, so I listen to them, but not the words. Long story short...

It's the same thing with people listening to Hypnobama. They don't know what he's saying, just that he sounds good.

I'm starting to get scared, but I'm not running away. I'm going to fight the crap going on in the Haunted--I mean White--House.

Sorry, that was really corny.

Friday, October 23, 2009

Socialism and Hate Crimes

Well. Apparently it is being considered that we could give state governments their own slightly unsocialistic freedom to opt out of the public option. It's being considered, I said. Of course, the responses from the Dems include a terrified "Nooooooo!" and a defiant "NEVEEEEEEEERRRRRR!!!!!", which means that, yes, they were pushing for socialism all along. No surprise there.



But now gays are protected under hate crime laws. What happened to freedom of speech? I don't hate gays themselves, I just disapprove of gay marriage. Oops, off to jail with me.

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

The War on Fox Continues... Iraq, Afghanistan, and the War on Terror Are Forgotten

Apparently, "Beck" and "Hannity", two opinion shows on Fox, are the reason for the White House's war on the network. Funny thing, those times--5 p.m. and 9 p.m.--are for opinion programs. So it's completely legitimate for opinion programs to be shown in the times set for opinion programs, no? According to Robert Gibbs, no indeed. "That is our opinion" was his response.


Gotta love liberals. They'll be proven wrong and shown the truth, but they'll still come out and say, "So what? I still have to seem right for pride's sake." I don't understand what they hope to accomplish by this. Mr. Bipartisan, Pass-the Healthcare-Bill-without-GOP-Support Barack Obama's administration is attacking Fox News for being a "Republican mouthpiece". The basis for their war on Fox: Fox dares to show opinion shows in times reserved for opinion shows. This is a grave sin punishable by something even worse than listening to Obama lie and grin (they have not discovered such a punishment yet, but the research looks promising). This is treason! This is a horrible new twist for our country. How will we cope with it all?

It sounds like I'm describing terrorism or the stimulus or something, right? Well, no. Above is a look at Fox from a Democrat's perspective, for those of you who didn't realize. Ah, if only it were true that I WAS talking about something worhtwhile from a Dem's perspective. If only they cared enough about America to override their wussiness and fight the real wars. If only they could look past their personal issues and troubles, their poor little hurt feelings, their petty jabbing at Fox, which did nothing more than check facts and air opinion shows in times reserved for opinion shows. If only they could care about America, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the war on terror, healthcare, taxes, unemployment. But no. They got their feelings hurt when Tammy Duckworth was proved wrong, and now they will stop at nothing to act on the petty grudge they insist on holding. This is treason. This is a horrible new twist for our country. How will we cope with it all?

Monday, October 19, 2009

Bias or B.S.?

The Obama administration is involved in many wars... the wars with Afghanistan, Iraq, my mom's exhaust pipe, and... Fox News?

Yes, folks, the White House has officially waged war on the network that independent studies,including some from the Pew Research Center, prove to be the most balanced. What's weird is, Fox News had such balanced election coverage, and the other networks had such screwed coverage, that their liberalism actual made Fox look biased to the right to some people. But oh, well. They really are the most balanced name in news.

The funny thing is, apparently Fox is a "Republican mouthpiece" and completely biased, but the "offense" that started it all was "fact-checking". They are called biased because they worked toward the truth. In fact, Anita Dunn asserts that fact-checking is "nothing she's ever seen a Sunday show do." Well, we know what networks SHE was watching.

The liberals are attacking Fox for fact-checking and proving them wrong. Oh, the horror! What is the world coming to? That a news network isn't afraid to speak out with facts? How will we bear it?

Anyone who reads this, send a message from me to all the liberals you know: stop being babies and get a life (and while you're at it, a job and a brain would be nice, too).

Proving liberals wrong when they accuse Fox isn't bias. Saying it is... that's B.S.

Friday, October 16, 2009

Broken Records, Breaking Records

So "broken records" refers to the repeating pattern of lies, flip-flops, etc. that seems to follow Obama wherever he goes. You know the saying, "You sound like a broken record"?



And "breaking records" refers to the federal deficit. It hit a record 1.42 trillion dollars. So, yay! Let's hear it for Barack Obama, the guy who won the Nobel Peace Prize for what he said he'd do, the guy who got elected for what he said he'd do, the guy who says he's doing something for us and somehow we believe everything he's saying. The guy who breaks all the records, makes history, first black President, third sitting US President to win the Nobel Peace Prize, first to win it for nothing, and the one under whom the federal deficit hits a record 1.42 trillion.

Honestly, sometimes I don't understand. I might be beginning to sound like a broken record here. I don't get why people think baby-killing is OK. I don't get how you can be both for and against abortion, gay marriage, and the public option. I don't get it, I don't get it, I don't get it...

At least no one else does, either.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Ominous Visions... Part Two of an October Series

I seee the fuuuuutuuuuure. Bewaaaare, BEWAAAAAAAAAARE!!!!!!

I have been given a glimpse of the future, my friends. Think on the following prophecy, and I hope you see the truth.

Eight hundred twenty nine
Dollars a billion times
Though budget officials cannot
Claim it saves a dime.

There will be death panels
And it funds abortion
Yet, the plan's opposers
Are accused of distortion.

The public option:
Yes or no?
No one knows.
No one has a clue
What the future holds
Do you?

Based on the ominous prophecy, what do you think?

Or even, based on everything that has happened, what do all the sane people KNOW? I think Congress knows that if they do anything stupid (er), they won't be in Congress for long. But I wonder if they even care. Maybe ruining America is a, like, dying wish or something.

Beware. When the people fear their government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty. And when the government rationalizes humans, kills babies, and spends $829B to do it... that's just creepy.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

For or Against

So, yet another promise Obama is failing to keep. It was a bad promise for our country anyway, but still. Obama said he would try to allow gays to be openly so in the military. Okay, I'm sorry, but I would feel awkward if I was fighting and camping with a bunch of other guys (or girls) who are openly gay around me.

Obama also says he doesn't support legalizing gay marriage, but he... says he would support a bill legally defining marriage as something other than between a man and a woman. So basically, he says gay marriage shouldn't be legal, but legally, marriage should be able to be more than just male-female. AKA, marriage should be legally defined as either straight or gay. But gay marriage would still be illegal.

Yeah, he confuses me, too. It's just another instance of him trying to please both ends of the political spectrum. The public option must be passed, but it isn't essential. Gay marriage is illegal, but legally, marriage can be gay. The guy doesn't even know what he believes.

Marriage was created for the purposes of love and children both. If someone has a reproductive disability, it was not their own choice to violate the marital sacrament. So they're fine. But gays make a choice. It's okay to be gay because you can't help your feelings, but you can choose how or if to act on them.

Anyway, it turns out that liberals are more pathetic than I thought. I was reading If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans by Ann Coulter, and an unnamed party said it offended them. I told them that there is freedom of speech, end of story. Which, of course, offended them. Go figure.

Another recent occurrence that demonstrates the ridiculosity (is that a word?) of liberals is as follows. I've told you that we had a pep rally for homecoming last week. Some kid wore an Obama mask when he participated in the games. So I booed and said, "If he can wear an Obama mask to school, I should be able to wear an Osama bin Ladin mask to school." One of my friends "reported me" to her mom, who said, "That is just wrong for a thirteen-year-old to compare our President to a mass murderer."

Actually, what's wrong is allowing innocent babies to be--what's the phrase? Oh, yes: mass murdered, 4400 every day. What's wrong is not letting us interrogate mass murderers, and threatening to let mass murderers go free (let's hope that's another promise he doesn't keep).

Speaking of abortion, it's so fun to stump people. They say, "Oh, if I got raped, I wouldn't want to have someone else's baby."

I say, "If I was the baby of a raped woman, I wouldn't want to die." And people usually just stare at me, mouths open. I go on to tell them that medical issues and rape or incest account for only 4% of abortions. So what about the other 96%? What about women who are careless, casual, irresponsible? That's their fault.

And speaking of faults, tell me ONE INSTANCE in which it's the baby's fault the mother got pregnant. That's what I thought.

By the way, did you ever notice how 100% of abortion advocates were not aborted? Interesting.

And even though all of this is true, Obama's socialist healthcare plan will fund abortions. "But it doesn't say it will," insist supporters of the plan, the mass-murdering plan. You're either for or against something. And they are NOT against it. You do the math. They struck down amendments to prohibit abortion funding.

People say, "Obama's not for abortion, just the right to have one." There's no real difference, because both result in an innocent child dead. You're FOR or AGAINST it. It's pretty simple.

On the "for-or-against" note, Obama is either for or against gay marriage. It can't be both legal and illegal at the same time.

IMHO, don't kill babies. Rule of thumb. Second rule: marriage=guy+gal. And rule three: don't trust flip-flopping, lying, cheating, conniving, senior-citizen-and-baby-killing, inflation-causing, dollar-devaluing, terrorist-freeing, self-proclaimed Messiahs.

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Peace Doesn't Mean What It Used To

Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing. That is very peaceful, I guess. You know the saying, "Rest in PEACE". Dead (peaceable) people don't really do anyhting, do they? I used to think the Nobel Peace Prize was something amazing, a great honor. But now it's meaningless. I mean, they gave it to someone who has been President for nine months. He was nominated at, like, four months. The only things he'd done since then were... promise to do a bunch of things, devalue the dollar, and allow us to fund overseas abortions.

And, hello? He gets about 1.4 million dollars. Like he couldn't print or borrow that if he needed it. Like he deserves to get his hands on money ever again. The Nobel Peace Prize is worthless.

By awarding it to Obama, they have defaced the Nobel Peace Prize. He got the prize for what he said he'd do. Kind of like how he got elected. He got the prize because of nothing. Okay, I'll admit he tried to make peace with terrorists by saying he'll close Gitmo and not letting us interrogate them. I admit he must be somehow at peace with Fidel Castro, since Fidel Castro thinks he is a savior and the rest of America is racist. I admit he must have peace with the Saudi king he bowed to, and the countries he apologized to for America being America. So sure. He's peaceful. He just lets us kill babies. Peace doesn't mean what it used to.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

If At First Success Is Obviously Impossible Via the Current Tactic... Try, Try Again?

So, when Obama receives news of yet more job losses, what does he do? Does he admit that he was completely wrong in every way and that the stimulus was a total waste? No.

He decides to distribute more of the stimulus.

He also insists that his healthcare plan will create jobs. Not so much. Actually, when private insurance companies go out of business, jobs will be lost. Or maybe he means that abortionists will be in greater demand so that will create more jobs. Maybe... maybe he's trying to create extra jobs for illegal immigrants? Or maybe a larger crew will be required to repair and extend the debt clock this time around. Or, or, maybe two totally new professions are in the making: end-of-life counseling and end-of-life causing.

It's really starting to annoy me. I mean, it's like your dad driving in circles and telling you you're not lost. If they actually cared, they'd admit they were wrong and help save America. But they won't, which is just more proof that Dems truly hate America and want us to die (just look at the allies of their savior, Obama (the AAA's): Ayers, ACORN, and Al Queda). The terrorist (s) are closer than you think (is the White House close enough?).

P.S. Did I just call Obama a terrorist? Anyone whose friend is a terrorist, who fights for terrorists' rights, and who sets them free (likely onto American soil), is as good as one of them. You do the math.

Friday, October 2, 2009

One More Lie

Yes, here we have proof that the claim that the Obama stimulus is "helping the economy" is just one more lie. The unemployment rate is at 9.8%. If you include those who were laid off and settled for a part-time job or just gave up looking for work, the rate is 17%. By the way, that's the highest it's been in 15 years.

Just thought people would want to know that, yes, they've failed (not necessarily on accident--some people just truly hate America) once again. The "economic recovery", if it happens at all, will be only a short-term effect because that's all the government knows how to produce. It won't be real. It's all just another lie.

Just thought you'd like to know.

Or maybe we've known all along...

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Attack of the Zombies...Part One of an October Series

So I've decided to start an October series leading up to a chilling climax on Halloween about the populate-the-cemetery Democratic-liberal healthcare plan. The "rolling in their graves" part refers to the Founding Fathers.

Let's get going. Part One is going to focus on illegal immigrants butting in on our healthcare (though if they want it, they can have it--we'll deport ObamaCare and illegals: a double bonus). Well, I guess they aren't butting in. I guess they're being invited in.

The Dems claim that illegal immigrants won't be covered by the plan. Let's clear something up. Illegal means that what they are doing is unlawful. If we caught all the illegal immigrants, there wouldn't be illegal immigrants. So if we don't know who they are, especially since insurance companies are NOT ALLOWED TO ASK WHETHER THEY'RE HERE LEGALLY, how do we know whether or not we're covering illegals if we don't know if someone's an illegal or not? It's just not possible to insist that you won't cover illegal immigrants. We don't know who all of them are!

I salute Joe Wilson. He realizes this. He realizes that nothing Obama says is backed by proof of substance. Obama wants us to stay in school, but he doesn't know the principle of having a good persuasive essay, informative essay, or speech: you need proof. As I've said before, his arguments are "That's false, untrue, a lie, not true, and invalid." It sounds good, but do you realize that he didn't say WHY it's false, WHY it's untrue, WHY it's a lie, WHY it's not true, or WHY it's invalid? It's just not believable at all.

It would be more believable if he had said the undead were attacking America.