For or Against

So, yet another promise Obama is failing to keep. It was a bad promise for our country anyway, but still. Obama said he would try to allow gays to be openly so in the military. Okay, I'm sorry, but I would feel awkward if I was fighting and camping with a bunch of other guys (or girls) who are openly gay around me.

Obama also says he doesn't support legalizing gay marriage, but he... says he would support a bill legally defining marriage as something other than between a man and a woman. So basically, he says gay marriage shouldn't be legal, but legally, marriage should be able to be more than just male-female. AKA, marriage should be legally defined as either straight or gay. But gay marriage would still be illegal.

Yeah, he confuses me, too. It's just another instance of him trying to please both ends of the political spectrum. The public option must be passed, but it isn't essential. Gay marriage is illegal, but legally, marriage can be gay. The guy doesn't even know what he believes.

Marriage was created for the purposes of love and children both. If someone has a reproductive disability, it was not their own choice to violate the marital sacrament. So they're fine. But gays make a choice. It's okay to be gay because you can't help your feelings, but you can choose how or if to act on them.

Anyway, it turns out that liberals are more pathetic than I thought. I was reading If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans by Ann Coulter, and an unnamed party said it offended them. I told them that there is freedom of speech, end of story. Which, of course, offended them. Go figure.

Another recent occurrence that demonstrates the ridiculosity (is that a word?) of liberals is as follows. I've told you that we had a pep rally for homecoming last week. Some kid wore an Obama mask when he participated in the games. So I booed and said, "If he can wear an Obama mask to school, I should be able to wear an Osama bin Ladin mask to school." One of my friends "reported me" to her mom, who said, "That is just wrong for a thirteen-year-old to compare our President to a mass murderer."

Actually, what's wrong is allowing innocent babies to be--what's the phrase? Oh, yes: mass murdered, 4400 every day. What's wrong is not letting us interrogate mass murderers, and threatening to let mass murderers go free (let's hope that's another promise he doesn't keep).

Speaking of abortion, it's so fun to stump people. They say, "Oh, if I got raped, I wouldn't want to have someone else's baby."

I say, "If I was the baby of a raped woman, I wouldn't want to die." And people usually just stare at me, mouths open. I go on to tell them that medical issues and rape or incest account for only 4% of abortions. So what about the other 96%? What about women who are careless, casual, irresponsible? That's their fault.

And speaking of faults, tell me ONE INSTANCE in which it's the baby's fault the mother got pregnant. That's what I thought.

By the way, did you ever notice how 100% of abortion advocates were not aborted? Interesting.

And even though all of this is true, Obama's socialist healthcare plan will fund abortions. "But it doesn't say it will," insist supporters of the plan, the mass-murdering plan. You're either for or against something. And they are NOT against it. You do the math. They struck down amendments to prohibit abortion funding.

People say, "Obama's not for abortion, just the right to have one." There's no real difference, because both result in an innocent child dead. You're FOR or AGAINST it. It's pretty simple.

On the "for-or-against" note, Obama is either for or against gay marriage. It can't be both legal and illegal at the same time.

IMHO, don't kill babies. Rule of thumb. Second rule: marriage=guy+gal. And rule three: don't trust flip-flopping, lying, cheating, conniving, senior-citizen-and-baby-killing, inflation-causing, dollar-devaluing, terrorist-freeing, self-proclaimed Messiahs.