Thursday, December 31, 2009

Good-Bye, Oh-Nine

**sigh**

It was a good year. Sure it was the year the socialist hypocrite got elected. Sure it was the year we decided to bring terrorists to America. Sure it was the year there were two terrorist attacks. But it was a good year.

There's not much I can say. Not anything that I haven't said before.

Muslim extremists are a threat. But that's racist.

Barack Obama is a terrorist. But that's racist (though he's half white...).

***** ******* (I don't use names of people in my life on my blog), a liberal in my grade, is a very misguided individual (to use nice terms). But that's racist (even though he's white...).

I'll only buy American-made, non-bailout cars, which is basically Ford (but that's racist against foreign countries and bailouts).

I guess I'll have to settle for being judged and labeled. If that's what it takes to save my country, it's worth it.

If you want to read more of my stuff (whoever reads this), I frequently post on republicanoperative.com (I have a link) under the handle "Freedom".

Happy '10.

Saturday, December 26, 2009

Year in Review (This is Painful)

Well, I don't know who still reads this, but I'm back.

It seems like Obama's been Prez forever, but in reality (which we seem to be quite out of touch with) it hasn't even been a year.

Not even a year and, let's see...

--Two terrorist attacks (Fort Hood and the Detroit Airport)(Bush kept us safe since 9/11)

--Obama Debt: $1 trillion (about)(Bush's was $700 billion over 8 years)

--Mexico City Act repealed (Bush was pro-life)

--Gitmo detainees sent home

--Gitmo detainees promised civilian trial (if they really were citizens of the U.S.... well, they wouldn't be anymore (we'd kick their beeep out))

--Plan for Gitmo detainees to be moved to Illinois

--Healthcare passed in House and Senate (Ah, yes, Ben Nelson. The Dems needed another vote to pass the healthcare bill (they had 59). Well, first the White  House supposedly (they, of course, deny it) threatened to close down a central command center in Nebraska (Nelson's state) thus threatening our national security. That was obviously an empty threat, so what ended up happening is that Nebraska gets free healthcare forever (well, not FREE, exactly, the REST of America has to pay for it...) and Nelson became the sixtieth vote on the Senate plan. Well, I'll go to jail, but I'm not paying for Nebraska's healthcare. Bribery and extortion... why am I not surprised? And did they ask the other states? No. Backroom deals and secret meeting, that's what the Democratic party's all about. But I wouldn't be surprised if real estate suddenly picks up in Nebraska...)

--Climate summit concludes that we need to stop emitting carbon (which I find funny, because 1) we need to breathe (though I'm sure many Dems don't want us to), and 2) hello? The plants of the ENVIRONMENT which is soooo valuable to them NEED carbon dioxide to live...)

--White House almost decides not to display nativity

--Economy "recovers", we save jobs (using a million bucks per job in my area, yay...)

--Stimulus passes (although I don't know if randomly throwing the bill together and not even reading it constitutes "passing")

--Obama declares that gay marriage should be defined legally as marriage, but should not be legal...?

--Joe Wilson shouts "You lie!" at Obama (kudos)

--Opponents of the healthcare plan "don't understand"

--Obama gets Nobel Peace Prize for nothing  (WAIT! it was for what he said he'd do)

--AND FINALLY...

1.3 million babies died, thanks to the fact that abortion is legal.

Lots of other things happened (Michael Jackson died, Billy Mays died, Tiger Woods' scandal and car crash), but how will we remember 2009? Politically, as the beginning of an error? As the year a certain movie came out, a certain celebrity died? As the last oh-something year? The year this or that car was made? What will the historians regard as the most significant event in America of 2009?

What does it matter? If we actually listened to historians, my whole list above would be gone.

What we learn from history is that we fail to learn from history.

What will we learn from 2009?

I hope whatever we learn shows up in 2012.

Happy New Year a few days early.

I'd rather be early than too late, and I hope so would you, America.

Happy New Year.

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Could Abortion Be What Kills Us?

That's what Sean Hannity said, inquiring whether or not the healthcare bill could get passed without prohibition of abortion specifically mentioned. I am proud to say that not a single Senate Republican is in support of the bill thus far. So maybe... maybe we're coming back?

Anyway, we better be coming back, because in three years' time, America will be so scared of Obama that they'll elect a Republican-- REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY'VE GOTTEN BETTER OR NOT. So we'll just be heading down a long, dark road.

I can never get over, no matter how much I try to understand, the fact that liberals think it's okay to kill an innocent child. Can someone explain why abortion should be legal, let alone for any reason, let alone ANY TIME IN PREGNANCY?

Here is the medical definiton of pregnancy: the condition of a woman or female mammal from conception until birth; the condition of being pregnant.

Here is the scientific definition of pregnancy: the condition of carrying developing offspring within the body.

Therefore, the scientific, medical definiton of pregnancy is: the condition of a woman or female mammal from conception until birth; the condition of carrying developing offspring within the body.

If it's not a baby, which clearly contradicts the definitions above, you are not pregnant. Therefore, if you insist against all reason that it is not a baby and therefore you are not pregnant, there is nothing to abort, therefore there is no need for abortion. Therefore, abortion is a needless practice and must be abolished. And what better way than in a bill that dares mention health, care, and abortion in the same sentence?

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Bored

Nothing is new in the political world. This horridness has become the norm and now we're bored. So sad. We shouldn't be bored while our country is being destroyed. But I think liberals took a nap, either that or we've hit bottom and can't go any farther. But this isn't the worst it can get. We can't be bored. If we're bored we'll be taken by surprise when the liberals wake up and we plunge farther down. While they've stalled in their tyranny, now is the time to act. Anyone know of a tea party in Michigan?

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Status Quo

So Bart Stupak authored an amendment that restricted abortion funding, which allowed for the narrow margin by which the bill passed. But David Axelrod, speaking for Obama, says he would not want to change the status quo on this. Sure, we "cannot accept the status quo", and those who do are crazy, but on this, challenging the status quo is completely unabidable. Hypocrite. Maybe some things need changing and some things need to stay the way they are? For example, maybe we need to stop killing babies, but we should stay capitalist. Is that so hard to wrap your minds around, liberals? Is that so ridiculous?

Apparently, this "shouldn't be a debate about abortion". Exactly. Don't include abortion coverage. Talk about that later. You're too busy turning America into a socialist country to debate about abortion. Let's not get crazy here. We need to be America for a tad longer, please, just for those who still cling to it, those crazies.

I mean, I completely understand that you want to get on with your socialist conquest of this nation, but some crazy folks are still clinging to thee horrendous thing our country was. Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, George Washington, John Hancock, Samuel Adams, Benjamin Franklin... we're getting duplicates of all of those horrible rebels. We feel we must abolish the rebel movements... but no. Let them have their last time in this horrible country. Because soon they will be gone.

Okay, I'm done mocking Democrats. Wouldn't want to get in trouble for challenging the status quo.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Desperation

Towns are battling to house the Gitmo detainees because of jobs. Obama's stimulus was worth jack so people are actually fighting to have terrorists come into their towns just so they can have work. They're risking their lives and those of their children and families so they can have work.

This is the "result" of Obama's "stimulus". Desperation. This is insanity. Are we really going to let these people battle to the death FOR their death? Are we really going to live with terrorists in our backyards, peering nervously out or windows before we draw the curtains and lock them every night? Our children looking over their shoulders as they walk to school, people paranoid about every bit of graffiti written on a wall.

And even if nothing happens, we'll be the lunatic country who invited the terrorists in.

Desperation.

The Chance of a Lifetime

Illinois.

It's where all the terrorists seem to have connections. Obama is from there, and we're considering sending the Gitmoe detainees there.

"A once-in-a-lifetime opportunity" it is called by Dick Durbin. How true. It will happen only once in our lifetimes... and never in anyone else's ever again. Apparently it would allow Chicago and surrounding areas to create more jobs. If we're desperate enough that our job opportunities include "prison guard for terrorists", that tells you how well the "stimulus" is working.

Oh, and get this. Poor little Chicago, who doesn't get to host the 2012 Olympics. Let's make it up to them with a new tourist attraction: "Terrorist-poking for the little ones and pie-throwing for adults; cost: your will". The tourists will come in waves after that.

This is the chance of a lifetime, people: the chance to end yours.

Saturday, November 14, 2009

"Never Forget"

What is meant by "never forget" is "always remember". Not "endanger them and remind them of their loved ones' deaths by bringing the terrorists back for a trip down memory lane".

There is no "evidence" of any kind that would justify VOLUNTARILY inviting terrorists into America, and giving them RIGHTS like those of the ones they killed. After all of this is over, Eric Holder, Obama, and the rest of his administration are next to take the stand. I want them tried for treason, attempted murder of America, and anything else you can think of. Then I want Obama impeached, removed from office, and sent to prison for the rest of his life. Of course, that won't haooen, but that's a taste of how unforgivable this is.

This is the worst thing a President has ever done. Obama is positively the worst President in history. I don't know what he's trying to pull here, but whatever he's doing needs to be stopped. He doesn't care enough about America to be entrusted with its safety. He doesn't put his hand over his heart. He left out "faithfully" in his oath (could be a coincidence... maybe it's not). He's closing Gitmo "by January 22"; that is, if we left any terrorists behind there. He kills America's future, and the ones he doesn't kill, he weighs down with debt, inflation, and poverty. He is not my President. He's not America's President. Here's whose President he is: Al Quaeda, Muslims, and all the people he either bowed or apologized to. Let them have him. Elect Paris Hilton, for all I care (okay, maybe not, but you get the picture). Just get his sorry **Democrat** out of here.

If we don't all get blown up first.

Now there's one more issue I'd like to address: the birth control pill gives you a huge risk for breast cancer. Not only that, but anyone who's watched "Demographic Bomb" will know that we need to reproduce more. Because of "population control" we are fallling below the 2.13 fertility rate needed to merely REPLACE a population. So why is our population growing? Because the elderly are living longer. But they can't live forever, and someday our aging population will die off, leaving the population to plummet, and not enough of a workforce for the future. In places like China, where they have the One-Child Policy... they can't replace their population, no matter how crowded they seem. And what else helps cause this? You guessed it--gay marriage. If every woman needs to have 2.13 children. So if they can't reproduce... that's 4.26 less children per lesbian couple. That can add up.

So we're either going to get blown up by terrorists we invited for tea, or we're going to experience a drastic population plummet and die that way if we don't do something NOW.

Never forget, America. Never forget who you are. Never forget the people who brought 9/11 upon you. Never forget that they are not Americans and do not deserve to be treated as such. Never forget America, America.

Never forget.

Friday, November 13, 2009

Saved

So the new movie, 2012, goes out of its way to avoid destroying any Muslim holy places. Sure, the Vatican goes down. A Buddhist temple goes down. But no Muslim holy places. Nope.

Just another example of media avoiding "offending Muslims". I'm "offended" by the fact that most terrorist attacks are by Muslims. I'm "offended" that my people are dying. And we can't acknowledge it. Someone save us.

Hollywood just knows they're safe because Christians won't bomb them.

Cowards.

Speaking of which, is Obama starring in a movie anytime soon?

The Terrorists Are Coming, The Terrorists Are Coming!

"The terrorists are coming, the terrorists are coming!" the man drove through the streets of New York City as fast as he could, calling into the night, "The terrorists are coming!"



If Paul Revere could see us now...



Yeah. The self-proclaimed ringleader of the 9/11 attacks, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, along with four other terrorists, are being tried in New York City just a few blocks down from Ground Zero. They are being tried in civilian court. What? WHAT? They are not Americans! They are barbaric, mass homicidal radicals who want to KILL Americans! People who are in favor of them being sent onto American soil say "There is no more appropriate place." Yeah, no more appropriate place than the place where they killed 3,000 people. This isn't memory lane. There's no more appropriate place to kill 3,000 MORE people.

And how are we supposed to get an unbiased jury? Any true American would be biased against a terrorist. Oh, hey, that gives me an idea: if we want a jury unbiased against terrorists, hey, let's get Obama and his staff!

And what about security? NO ONE can make sure the terrorists don't do anything horrible while they are IN AMERICA. Take them to military court! What else are they but members of an enemy military? A deadly, plotting, conniving, mass-murdering, lethal military. Ask those whose loved ones DIED. They've been through so much already. Let's march terrorists through their streets, let's endanger them again by voluntarily inviting the terrorists INTO NEW YORK, by giving the very barbarians who KILLED 3,000 AMERICANS a CIVILIAN TRIAL. Like they are on the same level as the three thousand they killed.

So the terrorists are Americans. Did I mention that if found innocent, they'd be set free? Of course, we're all sure they won't be found innocent, but to even consider...

The people who did THIS...





...are Americans? We're bringing them here, we're trying them like they are...

What does America mean anymore now that liberal Democrats are mutilating it? Speaking of them, did you notice how Obama made this announcement in ASIA? Why not America, which is where the rest of the criminals apparently are? Because he is a COWARD. He is a complete and total yellow-bellied coward. He needs to come back RIGHT NOW and say it to the faces of everyone who lost a loved one on 9/11: The murderers of your loved ones are coming here, we're INVITING them here, and, get this, we're treating them as we would treat your loved ones if they committed a crime: as Americans.

Think about the video above, of all those people... all those Americans... the people who killed them are not ONE OF THEM. Think about it. Think of 9/11. We're inviting it back. Come back, 9/11, Obama the Coward says.

This is insanity. I wish I could drive Obama and the terrorists out of the America personally.

What will America BE when the terrorists come?

The terrorists are coming, the terrorists are coming...

Or are they already here?...

Check the White House.

It's True

What does it mean that Hasan, the Fort Hood shooter, was a Muslim?

Well, come on, folks. Some people seem to be avoiding the fact that he's a Muslim. That's it. You can't deny it. Muslim extremists have been behind many attacks. You CAN NOT deny that. This doesn't mean all Muslims are bad, but it doesn't mean we should go out of our way to be completely un-wary of Muslims. We have to acknowledge: some of them are potentially dangerous. It's true.

You don't have to be automatically prejudiced against them, but be aware. The fact that Hasan was a Muslim is not irrelevant; it's significant. Don't ignore this, as many liberals are trying to. HE WAS A MUSLIM AND HE KILLED PEOPLE. It's true. It isn't true of all Muslims, but true of some. And some is enough for us to be careful.

Don't deny it. it's true.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Wondering With Conviction

I wonder whether or not President Obama is the right President for us. No, not really. I know he's probably the worst President in history. But things that could make those pesky little on-the-fence people wonder are:

1. He doesn't put his hand over his heart when saying the Pledge of Allegiance. Okay, most people would look at that and say, "Something is MAJORLY wrong."

2. His volunteerism career includes: ACORN, and letting prison inmates work on the streets in volunteer organizations.

3. His speech about the Fort Hood massacre. Let's see... a two-minute preamble about Indian rights, and then...
"Some of you might have heard" about the shooting at Fort Hood. Yes, we might have heard. There is some possibility that some of us might have heard.

You may recognize my comments above as being similar to ones on the Glenn Beck show last night. But I didn't get them there; I simply made the remarks myself while watching the show. Just clarifying for any liberals out there seeking to accuse a conservative.

4. He kills American babies because that's the kind of caring, nonviolent, compassionate liberal he is.

5. If you're unemployed right now, you know.

6. Healthcare rationing: he can't prove it won't happen. He can't prove anything, really, because that's just the way liberals are.

7. He messed up on his oath and left out "faithfully". Coincidence?

8. His BFF is a proud terrorist (but then, so are the people he promises to set free on American soil... everyone's a terrorist these days... including Barack Hussein Obama).

9. What he HAS done has been bad.

Now he's holding a job summit. And he says there are limits to what a government can and should do, but we need to consider every additional step? And the forum is meant to prevent making any "ill-considered decisions"? Why couldn't he have had this forum sometime before the stimulus? And he says the economic growth we've seen has not led to the jobs we need? That's cause he's a fake. Because we've "seen economic growth" just like he "picked up something off the floor" when he "shook hands" with a Saudi king. Just like he's a "Messiah". I already have a Messiah.

I am convinced he's not a Messiah, and I'm wondering when I'll get a President.

Monday, November 9, 2009

Then Was the Time

Well, it was the time, but not anymore. The only good thing that came of it was that Republicans are beinning to define themselves again, unitin in the face of this horrendous disaster. Only one Republican House member voted for the bill. Anh "Joseph" Cao, whoever you are: you let America down.



Then was the time. The next "time" will be when the Senate votes for the bill.



But there's another "time" I'm talking about. There's a time I've heard of, but never known I experienced. There was a time when Republicans were Republicans, where America was America and if anyone ever even considered BRINGING UP the proposition of socialism, we'd kick their, um, Democrats' mascots.

I miss when the lives that are fighting for our country were not constantly devalued. I miss when babies were not in the same class as murderers, I miss when America was soundly based on capitalism.

Then was the time.

But we're not completely messed up yet.

It's time for then again. Let's do this thing, America.

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Now Is The Time

This is the day the House votes on the healthcare bill. This is the day America either turns around or continues on the path of destruction. Obama says "Now is the time."


NOW IS THE TIME.

Come on, America. We're rootin' for ya.

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Be Very Afraid... Part Three in an October Series

Be very afraid; the healthcare market will no longer have competition. After dominating the market and putting the other insurance suppliers out of business, the government will know that, as the only option, they can do whatever they want. Well, I guess they've thought that for a long time, but let's not go there.

Obama is very scary. Here are the common Halloween emblems and how he reminds me of them:

Jack-o-lantern: grinning and dangerous.

Witch: constantly whipping up potions and conniving against others (unborn babies, the elderly - I mean, the rationably rationable).

Zombie: this term actually pertains more to his followers.

Black cat: don't let him cross your path. Now, before you say it, "black" has nothing to do with this. He's not black, anyway; he's bi-racial.

Graves: the ultimate outcome of the healthcare plan.

Right now I'm not concerned that the American people don't see him for who he is. Even if we did, he'd just go on doing whatever he wants. I admit I've been tricked by him, though maybe not in the way everyone else has. I thought he was just an ignorant, misguided guy who tries to please everyone and doesn't know what he's talking about. While I admit he doesn't know what he's talking about and he tries to please everyone, when he (and the rest of the Dems) want something done, it's done. They just sneak it in. Notice how the Senate bill does, in fact, have a public insurance option, though it is "unnecessary". He just said that so the right would chill. Well, if the guy who is one of the most liberal presidents ever is trying to please the right (proof that he is, in fact, a liberal, because they never know what they're doing), the left will get mad. And Obama will say, "Well, I didn't really mean it that way." And they'll be soothed by his hypnotic, "inspiring" voice just like everyone else. Speaking of which... those who find him inspiring (and I mean the ones that actually are inspired, not the ones who claim to be inspired but really just like him because he's black (the ones who call me racist)) are probably only hearing how he sounds. For instance, I think it's really lame how all Taylor Swift writes about is how her ex is a jerk, how she wishes she could be with this one guy, how someone else stole her guy, or how she loves this one guy. I mean, come on. Isn't there better stuff to write about? But I like the tunes to some of her songs, so I listen to them, but not the words. Long story short...

It's the same thing with people listening to Hypnobama. They don't know what he's saying, just that he sounds good.

I'm starting to get scared, but I'm not running away. I'm going to fight the crap going on in the Haunted--I mean White--House.

Sorry, that was really corny.

Friday, October 23, 2009

Socialism and Hate Crimes

Well. Apparently it is being considered that we could give state governments their own slightly unsocialistic freedom to opt out of the public option. It's being considered, I said. Of course, the responses from the Dems include a terrified "Nooooooo!" and a defiant "NEVEEEEEEEERRRRRR!!!!!", which means that, yes, they were pushing for socialism all along. No surprise there.



But now gays are protected under hate crime laws. What happened to freedom of speech? I don't hate gays themselves, I just disapprove of gay marriage. Oops, off to jail with me.

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

The War on Fox Continues... Iraq, Afghanistan, and the War on Terror Are Forgotten

Apparently, "Beck" and "Hannity", two opinion shows on Fox, are the reason for the White House's war on the network. Funny thing, those times--5 p.m. and 9 p.m.--are for opinion programs. So it's completely legitimate for opinion programs to be shown in the times set for opinion programs, no? According to Robert Gibbs, no indeed. "That is our opinion" was his response.


Gotta love liberals. They'll be proven wrong and shown the truth, but they'll still come out and say, "So what? I still have to seem right for pride's sake." I don't understand what they hope to accomplish by this. Mr. Bipartisan, Pass-the Healthcare-Bill-without-GOP-Support Barack Obama's administration is attacking Fox News for being a "Republican mouthpiece". The basis for their war on Fox: Fox dares to show opinion shows in times reserved for opinion shows. This is a grave sin punishable by something even worse than listening to Obama lie and grin (they have not discovered such a punishment yet, but the research looks promising). This is treason! This is a horrible new twist for our country. How will we cope with it all?

It sounds like I'm describing terrorism or the stimulus or something, right? Well, no. Above is a look at Fox from a Democrat's perspective, for those of you who didn't realize. Ah, if only it were true that I WAS talking about something worhtwhile from a Dem's perspective. If only they cared enough about America to override their wussiness and fight the real wars. If only they could look past their personal issues and troubles, their poor little hurt feelings, their petty jabbing at Fox, which did nothing more than check facts and air opinion shows in times reserved for opinion shows. If only they could care about America, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the war on terror, healthcare, taxes, unemployment. But no. They got their feelings hurt when Tammy Duckworth was proved wrong, and now they will stop at nothing to act on the petty grudge they insist on holding. This is treason. This is a horrible new twist for our country. How will we cope with it all?

Monday, October 19, 2009

Bias or B.S.?

The Obama administration is involved in many wars... the wars with Afghanistan, Iraq, my mom's exhaust pipe, and... Fox News?

Yes, folks, the White House has officially waged war on the network that independent studies,including some from the Pew Research Center, prove to be the most balanced. What's weird is, Fox News had such balanced election coverage, and the other networks had such screwed coverage, that their liberalism actual made Fox look biased to the right to some people. But oh, well. They really are the most balanced name in news.

The funny thing is, apparently Fox is a "Republican mouthpiece" and completely biased, but the "offense" that started it all was "fact-checking". They are called biased because they worked toward the truth. In fact, Anita Dunn asserts that fact-checking is "nothing she's ever seen a Sunday show do." Well, we know what networks SHE was watching.

The liberals are attacking Fox for fact-checking and proving them wrong. Oh, the horror! What is the world coming to? That a news network isn't afraid to speak out with facts? How will we bear it?

Anyone who reads this, send a message from me to all the liberals you know: stop being babies and get a life (and while you're at it, a job and a brain would be nice, too).

Proving liberals wrong when they accuse Fox isn't bias. Saying it is... that's B.S.

Friday, October 16, 2009

Broken Records, Breaking Records

So "broken records" refers to the repeating pattern of lies, flip-flops, etc. that seems to follow Obama wherever he goes. You know the saying, "You sound like a broken record"?



And "breaking records" refers to the federal deficit. It hit a record 1.42 trillion dollars. So, yay! Let's hear it for Barack Obama, the guy who won the Nobel Peace Prize for what he said he'd do, the guy who got elected for what he said he'd do, the guy who says he's doing something for us and somehow we believe everything he's saying. The guy who breaks all the records, makes history, first black President, third sitting US President to win the Nobel Peace Prize, first to win it for nothing, and the one under whom the federal deficit hits a record 1.42 trillion.

Honestly, sometimes I don't understand. I might be beginning to sound like a broken record here. I don't get why people think baby-killing is OK. I don't get how you can be both for and against abortion, gay marriage, and the public option. I don't get it, I don't get it, I don't get it...

At least no one else does, either.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Ominous Visions... Part Two of an October Series

I seee the fuuuuutuuuuure. Bewaaaare, BEWAAAAAAAAAARE!!!!!!

I have been given a glimpse of the future, my friends. Think on the following prophecy, and I hope you see the truth.

Eight hundred twenty nine
Dollars a billion times
Though budget officials cannot
Claim it saves a dime.

There will be death panels
And it funds abortion
Yet, the plan's opposers
Are accused of distortion.

The public option:
Yes or no?
No one knows.
No one has a clue
What the future holds
Do you?

Based on the ominous prophecy, what do you think?

Or even, based on everything that has happened, what do all the sane people KNOW? I think Congress knows that if they do anything stupid (er), they won't be in Congress for long. But I wonder if they even care. Maybe ruining America is a, like, dying wish or something.

Beware. When the people fear their government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty. And when the government rationalizes humans, kills babies, and spends $829B to do it... that's just creepy.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

For or Against

So, yet another promise Obama is failing to keep. It was a bad promise for our country anyway, but still. Obama said he would try to allow gays to be openly so in the military. Okay, I'm sorry, but I would feel awkward if I was fighting and camping with a bunch of other guys (or girls) who are openly gay around me.

Obama also says he doesn't support legalizing gay marriage, but he... says he would support a bill legally defining marriage as something other than between a man and a woman. So basically, he says gay marriage shouldn't be legal, but legally, marriage should be able to be more than just male-female. AKA, marriage should be legally defined as either straight or gay. But gay marriage would still be illegal.

Yeah, he confuses me, too. It's just another instance of him trying to please both ends of the political spectrum. The public option must be passed, but it isn't essential. Gay marriage is illegal, but legally, marriage can be gay. The guy doesn't even know what he believes.

Marriage was created for the purposes of love and children both. If someone has a reproductive disability, it was not their own choice to violate the marital sacrament. So they're fine. But gays make a choice. It's okay to be gay because you can't help your feelings, but you can choose how or if to act on them.

Anyway, it turns out that liberals are more pathetic than I thought. I was reading If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans by Ann Coulter, and an unnamed party said it offended them. I told them that there is freedom of speech, end of story. Which, of course, offended them. Go figure.

Another recent occurrence that demonstrates the ridiculosity (is that a word?) of liberals is as follows. I've told you that we had a pep rally for homecoming last week. Some kid wore an Obama mask when he participated in the games. So I booed and said, "If he can wear an Obama mask to school, I should be able to wear an Osama bin Ladin mask to school." One of my friends "reported me" to her mom, who said, "That is just wrong for a thirteen-year-old to compare our President to a mass murderer."

Actually, what's wrong is allowing innocent babies to be--what's the phrase? Oh, yes: mass murdered, 4400 every day. What's wrong is not letting us interrogate mass murderers, and threatening to let mass murderers go free (let's hope that's another promise he doesn't keep).

Speaking of abortion, it's so fun to stump people. They say, "Oh, if I got raped, I wouldn't want to have someone else's baby."

I say, "If I was the baby of a raped woman, I wouldn't want to die." And people usually just stare at me, mouths open. I go on to tell them that medical issues and rape or incest account for only 4% of abortions. So what about the other 96%? What about women who are careless, casual, irresponsible? That's their fault.

And speaking of faults, tell me ONE INSTANCE in which it's the baby's fault the mother got pregnant. That's what I thought.

By the way, did you ever notice how 100% of abortion advocates were not aborted? Interesting.

And even though all of this is true, Obama's socialist healthcare plan will fund abortions. "But it doesn't say it will," insist supporters of the plan, the mass-murdering plan. You're either for or against something. And they are NOT against it. You do the math. They struck down amendments to prohibit abortion funding.

People say, "Obama's not for abortion, just the right to have one." There's no real difference, because both result in an innocent child dead. You're FOR or AGAINST it. It's pretty simple.

On the "for-or-against" note, Obama is either for or against gay marriage. It can't be both legal and illegal at the same time.

IMHO, don't kill babies. Rule of thumb. Second rule: marriage=guy+gal. And rule three: don't trust flip-flopping, lying, cheating, conniving, senior-citizen-and-baby-killing, inflation-causing, dollar-devaluing, terrorist-freeing, self-proclaimed Messiahs.

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Peace Doesn't Mean What It Used To

Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing. That is very peaceful, I guess. You know the saying, "Rest in PEACE". Dead (peaceable) people don't really do anyhting, do they? I used to think the Nobel Peace Prize was something amazing, a great honor. But now it's meaningless. I mean, they gave it to someone who has been President for nine months. He was nominated at, like, four months. The only things he'd done since then were... promise to do a bunch of things, devalue the dollar, and allow us to fund overseas abortions.

And, hello? He gets about 1.4 million dollars. Like he couldn't print or borrow that if he needed it. Like he deserves to get his hands on money ever again. The Nobel Peace Prize is worthless.

By awarding it to Obama, they have defaced the Nobel Peace Prize. He got the prize for what he said he'd do. Kind of like how he got elected. He got the prize because of nothing. Okay, I'll admit he tried to make peace with terrorists by saying he'll close Gitmo and not letting us interrogate them. I admit he must be somehow at peace with Fidel Castro, since Fidel Castro thinks he is a savior and the rest of America is racist. I admit he must have peace with the Saudi king he bowed to, and the countries he apologized to for America being America. So sure. He's peaceful. He just lets us kill babies. Peace doesn't mean what it used to.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

If At First Success Is Obviously Impossible Via the Current Tactic... Try, Try Again?

So, when Obama receives news of yet more job losses, what does he do? Does he admit that he was completely wrong in every way and that the stimulus was a total waste? No.

He decides to distribute more of the stimulus.

He also insists that his healthcare plan will create jobs. Not so much. Actually, when private insurance companies go out of business, jobs will be lost. Or maybe he means that abortionists will be in greater demand so that will create more jobs. Maybe... maybe he's trying to create extra jobs for illegal immigrants? Or maybe a larger crew will be required to repair and extend the debt clock this time around. Or, or, maybe two totally new professions are in the making: end-of-life counseling and end-of-life causing.

It's really starting to annoy me. I mean, it's like your dad driving in circles and telling you you're not lost. If they actually cared, they'd admit they were wrong and help save America. But they won't, which is just more proof that Dems truly hate America and want us to die (just look at the allies of their savior, Obama (the AAA's): Ayers, ACORN, and Al Queda). The terrorist (s) are closer than you think (is the White House close enough?).

P.S. Did I just call Obama a terrorist? Anyone whose friend is a terrorist, who fights for terrorists' rights, and who sets them free (likely onto American soil), is as good as one of them. You do the math.

Friday, October 2, 2009

One More Lie

Yes, here we have proof that the claim that the Obama stimulus is "helping the economy" is just one more lie. The unemployment rate is at 9.8%. If you include those who were laid off and settled for a part-time job or just gave up looking for work, the rate is 17%. By the way, that's the highest it's been in 15 years.

Just thought people would want to know that, yes, they've failed (not necessarily on accident--some people just truly hate America) once again. The "economic recovery", if it happens at all, will be only a short-term effect because that's all the government knows how to produce. It won't be real. It's all just another lie.

Just thought you'd like to know.

Or maybe we've known all along...

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Attack of the Zombies...Part One of an October Series

So I've decided to start an October series leading up to a chilling climax on Halloween about the populate-the-cemetery Democratic-liberal healthcare plan. The "rolling in their graves" part refers to the Founding Fathers.

Let's get going. Part One is going to focus on illegal immigrants butting in on our healthcare (though if they want it, they can have it--we'll deport ObamaCare and illegals: a double bonus). Well, I guess they aren't butting in. I guess they're being invited in.

The Dems claim that illegal immigrants won't be covered by the plan. Let's clear something up. Illegal means that what they are doing is unlawful. If we caught all the illegal immigrants, there wouldn't be illegal immigrants. So if we don't know who they are, especially since insurance companies are NOT ALLOWED TO ASK WHETHER THEY'RE HERE LEGALLY, how do we know whether or not we're covering illegals if we don't know if someone's an illegal or not? It's just not possible to insist that you won't cover illegal immigrants. We don't know who all of them are!

I salute Joe Wilson. He realizes this. He realizes that nothing Obama says is backed by proof of substance. Obama wants us to stay in school, but he doesn't know the principle of having a good persuasive essay, informative essay, or speech: you need proof. As I've said before, his arguments are "That's false, untrue, a lie, not true, and invalid." It sounds good, but do you realize that he didn't say WHY it's false, WHY it's untrue, WHY it's a lie, WHY it's not true, or WHY it's invalid? It's just not believable at all.

It would be more believable if he had said the undead were attacking America.

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Yes, We Can!

We did it. Republicans are Republicans (or at least getting there). We struck down both amendments that would add a public option to the Senate bill. Even some Democrats opposed it. And almost all, if not all, of the Republicans opposed both amendments. One amendment was defeated 15 to 8, the other 13 to 10. Things are looking up. To Obama, I have one thing to say about America taking back their country, no matter how well the person holding the country can talk:

Yes we can!

Monday, September 28, 2009

Two Biggest Differences Between God and Obama

Difference No. 1: The media sure as heck don't worship God.

Difference No. 2: God doesn't think he's Obama.

So anyway, just wanted to get a little laugh in. Here's the deal. Turns out the libs are saying we shouldn't "bar illegal immigrants from paying their way in a government-sponsored exchange". That's like... that's like... it's hard to come up with an analogy to match this one. I mean, illegal immigrants are breaking the law. Okay? These are criminals who aren't even citizens of our country. What we do is we catch them, deport them, and then ask them if they want the United States' (correction: Canada's) health insurance. Which they won't be able to get because they won't be citizens.

If Obama cares about us so much, why are his liberal hordes and himself doing everything in their power (and some things outside their power) to help everyone but us? There are "47 million uninsired Americans" and there are, what, 13, 14 million illegal immigrants? Who will Obama choose? WWOD? What will Obama do?

Friday, September 25, 2009

Freedom of Expression

As much as I hate to say it, the New Jersey students had every right to make those videos. That's their constitutional right. But we have the same right (scary music). The fact that they made those videos (and obviously were brainwashed) doesn't mean the conservatives are scared. Okay, let me rephrase that. We've been scared for some time now, but we won't back down because of some videos. I mean, liberals might get freaked out by constitutional rights, but the right doesn't.

Alleluia to Obama

These songs were sung and taped by New Jersey students. Wow. People actually worship Obama. Usually I joke about people worshipping him, but they really do. See for yourself. These are the song lyrics:



Song 1:

Mm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
He said that all must lend a hand

To make this country strong again

Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
He said we must be fair today

Equal work means equal pay

Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
He said that we must take a stand

To make sure everyone gets a chance

Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
He said red, yellow, black or white

All are equal in his sight

Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
Yes!

Mmm, mmm, mm
Barack Hussein Obama



I assume they say "Mmm, mmm, mm" because the next step after gay marriage is cannibalism. And how kind of them to mention his middle name to remind us all that, yes, Obama is friends with a terrorist (he's working on befriending more). Everyone must lend a hand, unless you oppose him; if so, shut up. Be fair today? When did killing innocent people become fair? Equal work means equal pay. With the exception of, of course, Congress and Barack Hussein Obama (mmm, mmm, mm). Who decides whose jobs equal others and who gets paid "equally"? If we all get paid equally, do we get to tax the government? No matter what color you are, you're equal in his sight. Unless you're red (red state).



Song 2:

Hello, Mr. President we honor you today!

For all your great accomplishments, we all doth say "hooray!"
Hooray, Mr. President!


You're number one! The first black American to lead this great nation!
Hooray, Mr. President we honor your great plans


To make this country's economy number one again!
Hooray Mr. President, we're really proud of you!


And we stand for all Americans under the great Red, White, and Blue!
So continue ---- Mr. President we know you'll do the trick


So here's a hearty hip-hooray ----
Hip, hip hooray!


Hip, hip hooray!

Hip, hip hooray!

We honor him for all his great accomplishments... That's sort of rude to Obama, don't you think? I mean, if I was going to be honored, I'd want to be honored for something other than something akin to having polka-dotted unicorns eat the Earth (AKA something horrible and impossible). Mr. President, we know you'll trick us all! So here's a hearty hip-hooray...

Which one sounds better, more logical, and more believable: "In God we trust" or "In Obama we trust"? I think God wins by a landslide. Which is why we have him on our dollar bills. Though maybe we should put Obama on them, since he's the one who made (and is making) them worthless.

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

The Love Train

I believe I've mentioned this a few times in previous posts. The "Love Train" is a very nice idea. Very nice. Too nice. People can't just be nice to everyone else and expect everyone else to be nice to them. The world does not, sadly, work that way.

Raise your hand if the date 9/11 has any significance in your mind. Ever watch TV? Well, then you know that people hurt one another. Has anyone you knew or someone they knew been murdered? Sure, it's not very significant what party you are (there are liberal Republicans and "Reagan Democrats"), but it does matter where your values lie. People blow up buildings, kill thousands. People kill their own children, for crying out loud. We need to protect America from people who want to destroy it. Here's an example of why you just can't ignore some things (like bombs). I was in gym class the other day, and you know how there's always a couple clowns in a crowd? Well, two such guys kept trying to steal the basketball from my friend and me. We did a pretty good job of keeping it away, but they got it a couple times. Finally my friend said, "I just want to play basketball. Let's ignore them."

I said, "Well, if we ignore them, we won't get to play anyway. They'll just take it. So at least if we try to keep it we get to play."

It's like, "I want to live without fear of terrorist attacks. So I'm going to ignore them!"

You can't put everything on the "Love Train."

The Nuclear Option

So, as a "last resort" (which was pretty much their plan from the start), Harry Reid says he will use "reconciliation", which basically means that the Dems can pass key parts of the bill with only a simple majority, so they won't need GOP support.

So who cares about America? Especially when we have illegal immigrants to worry about.

Reid says he hopes he doesn't have to go to those lengths. Right. The libs, for once, actually want conservatives to be patriotic so they have an excuse to shove their healthcare bill down our throats. So it's either we agree with the Dems and pass the bill or they leave us in the dust and they pass the bill.

If they cared about America's health, they'd listen to Americans. But we know that. We know they're desperate to push their healthcare agenda no matter the cost. We know they're ruthless lunatics bent on destroying everything America was.

The question is, how does this knowledge help us, and what can we do if (even though most Americans are doubting their plan and we tell them so, and they have been proved wrong countless times) they pass the bill anyway without listening to America and just ignoring the GOP? How can we stop them if they just ignore us?

America, we need to think of something to defeat the nuclear option and the public option so we can have the option of LIVING.

Sunday, September 20, 2009

Tax: I Think It Has a Pretty Universal Meaning

So, George Stephanopoulos asked, "Under this mandate, the government is forcing people to spend money, fining you if you don't. How is that not a tax?"

Seriously. But here's what Obama said (with, of course, a considerable amount of stammering and stuttering that tends to happen when you're caught in a moment of utter stupidity): " No, but -- but, George, you -- you can't just make up that language and decide that that's called a tax increase."

Making up languages? Merriam-Webster is offended. The whole English-speaking population is offended. Well, I guess he still has illegal immigrants as his BFF's. This is the dictionary definition of tax: a charge, usually of money, imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes.

So let's see. Okay, a tax is a charge, and a fine is a charge, and requiring someone to pay money is a charge. So whether or not they end up paying for healthcare, they are taxed. Imposed by authority? Yes, the government is imposing it. On persons or property for public purposes... check. Public purposes such as helping their healthcare plan. People such as we, the people. Apparently we're the property of the government. But Obama said, "No. That -- that's not true, George. The -- for us to say that you've got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase."

Once again, Obama's fabulous defense: No I'm not, you're lying, that's false, that's ridiculous, that's not true, that's untrue, that's preposterous, that's absolutely not a tax increase. Evidence? What's that mean? Anyone got a dictionary?

Discouraged

If the CIA investigations continue, some CIA officials insist that some will be discouraged from properly fighting terrorism.

Maybe that's what Obama wants. Our own President fights for... terrorists' rights?

That's discouraging.

Friday, September 18, 2009

Happy Belated Constitution Day

This is going to have slightly less pessimism than my posts usually do. Or, I hope it will. I kind of lost my optimism somewhere on or after January 20, 2009. Crap, I'm doing it again. This is harder than I thought. Maybe it would be easier if I didn't have so much to be pessimistic about. No, never mind, the world is full of optimism. Today is a new day, Constitution Day was two days ago, and we finally have a President who's on the right track (did I mention I got a pet unicorn?). Okay, never mind. I can't do this. Optimism and denying reality are two very different things.

But seriously, there is something to be optimistic about. Obama confirmed that Wilson's outburst and healthcare criticism in general is not about race, but about--of all things--healthcare. So, Maureen Dowd and all those other liberal I-don't-care-if-it-has-to-do-with-race-he's-black-so-you're-racist fanatics have been dissed by their Almighty Obama. At least he knows that we disagree with him because he's a lunatic and not because of the color of his skin.

And also, I think America is finally starting to REALIZE he's a lunatic, no matter what color he is. So. That's a plus. No more brainwashed citizens. I think we see past the smooth talk. Some of us.

So anyway. Happy Constitution Day two days late. To celebrate, tell your grandparents you love them (you respected your elders in 1787). Tell your children you love them (enough to have had them). If you're a girl tell your husband, if you're a guy tell your wife, "I love you." Tell America you love it by excercising your freedoms and doing something to save it.

And tell the government:

I love America. It's you guys I worry about (and therefore I worry about America, too, I guess).

Ever heard the song "Love Train"? I want to know if that guy's on, like, Valium or something. Are you kidding me? We should try to love everyone, yeah, but sometimes you have to stand up for those you love, for what you believe in. Some people, like the people who killed 3,000 on September 11, 2001, need to be shown a thing or two. It's not hate. It's justice.

Tell America you love it. There's a lot of love going around, it's just directed wrong, like at terrorists, Muslims, illegals, Cuba, and all those people who hate us.

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Friends Don't Let Friends Be ACORN, Obama, or Terrorists

My first thought about Obama is (okay, not my first thought, but I don't swear on this blog): With friends like these... I mean, can't you get better friends than ACORN and terrorists? Not to mention... Nancy Pelosi?!

It was finally decided that we would stop funding ACORN with federal dollars. One argument against cutting off funding was that they "helped the Democratic party".

Yeah, by committing voter fraud.

"It advocates for the poor."

Yeah, well, it also sets up child prostitution houses.

"It supported Obama in his campaign."

...no comment.

And speaking of Obama, what President calls ANYONE a jacka** publicly? Even if he was acting like one. I mean, it's okay to remark privately to your wife or a friend, but especially as President... you just don't do that.

Then again, you just don't murder children, rationalize humans, try to befriend terrorists and spend your way out of debt, or revert to socialism, either.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

"You Lie!": The Dems' Heaven-Sent Diversion

The Dems were actually glad when Wilson yelled "You lie!" at Obama. It provided the perfect diversion. It distracted the public from the actual substance (or lack thereof) of Obama's speech. They know as well as you and I that Obama's arguments against critics of his plan ("That is a lie." "That is false." "That is not true.") won't stand for long. So of course they'll beat the dead horse as long as they can.

Even though Obama accepted Wilson's apology, the rest of the Dems still insist on making Wilson apologize on the House floor. He apologized to Obama in a public statement. Obama accepted the apology. Apparently the Dems, for ONCE, decided to undermine their sacred Messiah and try to punish Wilson.

Well, we're not falling for their distraction. Wilson shouted "You lie!" for a reason. He was right.

Either Obama is flat-out lying or he's not telling the whole truth. It doesn't really matter.

First, he said that illegal immigrants are not going to be covered by his plan. How convenient for illegal immigrants, though, that insurance companies are NOT ALLOWED TO ASK YOU IF YOU'RE HERE LEGALLY. Yeah. So, it won't cover illegal immigrants, but we're not allowed to find out whether people are legal citizens.

Second, he said it would not cover abortions. Once again, it "won't cover abortions", but the Democrats refused an amendment to the bill that would prohibit federal abortion funding. So, it won't do something, but an amendment to make sure it won't do something was refused. Why was it refused, if they're really telling the truth?

Third, he insists that it would not be a complete government overhaul of healthcare. Of course not. At first. But everyone will want to switch to the "free" plan, so the insurance companies will go out of business. Then, when everyone wants to switch back to private insurance so they can get open-heart surgery (they don't have the time to wait for all the people with scrapes and bruises to get out of the OR), they won't be able to switch, because the insurance companies will be dead.

Fourth, the healthcare plan won't "add a single dime to our deficit"? No, it'll just suck every dime out of the American public.

Finally, apparently there will be no death panels. Then why did Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel talk about a "priority curve"? We're prioritizing humans now? "No, we're not!" Obama insists.

YOU LIE.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Powerless

Osama bin Ladin called Obama powerless to end the war in Afghanistan. I think he is right at least in that Obama is powerless.

Obama refuses to let us interrogate terrorists in ways that yield promising information. He is closing the Gitmo prison and sending the detainees... somewhere. Like our backyards. So, yeah, Obama is powerless. He is powerless to protect his country. He might be able to protect the terrorists, though.

Sunday, September 13, 2009

Can You Play That "Racism" Card One More Time?

So, Joe Wilson's outburst was an issue of race, huh?

Strange how he yelled "You lie" at Obama after he talked about how illegal immigrants would not be covered in the healthcare plan. And yet Maureen Dowd, a NY Times columnist, insists that it was an issue of race. Can she honestly imply that he wouldn't have shouted "You lie" at a white liar? A lie is a lie, no matter who tells it.

Skin color is no issue if someone is putting lives at risk or lying about major issues. Whoever does that is dangerous. Wilson obviously felt that Obama was doing just that. But it's just like a liberal to insist that anyone who disagrees with a colored person's morals is racist. Believe me, I've been called racist myself.

If Wilson told Obama he detested Obama's homemade cupcakes, Wilson would be called racist. It's an unwinnable battle. Anything you say is racism. His outburst was out of place, but calling him racist is going too far.

But we all know liberals are experts at ignorantly going too far.

Friday, September 11, 2009

Obama's Supporters

There are many ways to get money. The government primarily does so by printing or borrowing it and ripping off taxpayers. Lazy liberals get on welfare. Patriotic, hardworking Americans get a freaking job.

On Hannity, one caller called in saying she liked Obama's plan because she had a friend on welfare who lived in this nice house and didn't work. Her friend didn't want to pay for her healthcare, so she liked Obama's plan.

My friend's dad says that liberals are liberals because being a liberal is easy. It requires no thinking, doing... or working. That's why they're Obama fans.

So there you have it: Obama's supporters. Oh, and don't forget the illegals, Muslims, and terrorists.

Terrorism and Why We Must Stop It

First, let's take a moment of silence in remembrance of the nearly 3,000 lives lost on September eleventh, 2001.

Now let's make sure it never happens again.

The Guantanamo Bay detention center should not be closed, and we need to keep using interrogation methods that work. Oh, wait. We can't, because Obama came and it's too late.

No, it's not.

We can reverse this, we can fight this, and we can save our country.

In my opinion, anyone who treats terrorists as anything less than radical, crazed enemies of our country is as good as one of them. You do the math.

Did you realize that one thousand more than died in nine-eleven die every day by abortion? Yeah. Terrorism at its best.

How can we forget what happened and hope the terrorists can be our friends?

If Obama was President when the terrorists were heading a plane toward the White House, would he still insist we treat them as friends?

I told one of my friends that I would jab toothpicks under the fingernails of a terrorist to get information. She said, "They are people, too! Aren't all people created equal?"

I said, "Yes. So they shouldn't bomb us, number one. And number two, people are created equal. So if someone from American Idol bombed us, I'd jab toothpicks under their fingernails, too."

"You scare me," she said.

"Plane-hijacking, radical, murderous terrorists scare me," I said.

I guess we aren't scared or sad enough.

You know the saying "I shoulda seen it coming like an atom bomb," or "You'll need an atom bomb to show you the truth"?

In our case, it might take two atom bombs. Or one impeachment and removal from office. You decide.

If we do nothing, the terrorists won't hate us any less. More of us will die, that's all. Just like war.

I miss the good old days when terrorists were terrorists, safety was safety, and we didn't have to worry about another 9/11.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

The Future of America

Obama, in his address, says the future depends on us. The most sensible thing he's ever said. Of course, he probably meant the future depends on our being his mindless supporters, but he also said we choose our own destiny. So he may not be getting the mob of lemmings he'd hoped for.

He says he wants to make the nation more fair and more free. Is fairness not listening to America when we say we don't want his healthcare plan? Is freedom being afraid of terrorist attacks because your president tried to make friends with them?

He says we need to help old folks like him. No, he needs to help old folks by not rationalizing them.

He talked about how we had to fail to succeed. Nice try, pal. There's no excuse for the kind of failure you've been exhibiting. He talked about how you write many drafts of a paper. Included in drafting is editing and rereading. Apparently the "drafts of a paper" part was lost when they wrote the stimulus.

He said asking for help was good; he does it every day. He says it's a sign of strength, admitting you don't know something (like how to be President). It's okay to be wrong and know it (you know, by apologizing for being America). Sure, he asks for help. From anyone but a Republican.

He asks us to consider our contributions to America, our problems to solve. I know a big problem off the bat: Barack Obama.

He says we all have things to contribute; we should give ourselves a chance. What about giving the unborn a chance to contribute?

He says he's working to give us children a better education--the ones who survived Roe v. Wade, anyway.

All in all, his speech was convincing and smooth, as usual. Which says what? Ogres' voices are sweet and hypnotic. So?

I'll get an education. I'll make my contribution to America: helping to save us from liberalism and helping to save us from terrorism (sorry, that's redundant).

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

The Compassionate Left...?

So, let me get this straight. We go all crazy about possible "abuse" of terrorists, but it's perfectly legitimate and acceptable to convince citizens to kill themselves. To put it another way, we must launch an extreme investigation into whether or not CIA agents abused (define "abused") those who bomb us to pieces (now THAT'S abuse), but we're doing everyone a favor by getting rid of the elderly, many of them veterans of fights against terrorists.

So, the left is compassionate because they harbor terrorists and fraternize with the enemy, yet kill unborn children and grandparents. The left is compassionate because they ridicule those who try to protect our nation. The left is compassionate because they are the self-proclaimed protectors of terrorists and traitors.

How lucky we right-wingers are that SOMEONE knows in their heart (not their brain) what is left.

Monday, August 31, 2009

U.S.' BFF's: Hitler, Bill Ayers, Assorted Terrorists... Fidel Castro?

My apologies for not having posted in a while. I was at my Grandma's for a wedding, and you can't go on the Internet at her house without using her phone line.

This week I'll be going to North Carolina for my great-grandma's one hundredth birthday. Yeah. I salute the long, full, happy life of my great-grandma. I love her so much, her stories, her hugs.

If Obama rips her life away, or any other valuable citizens', for that matter, then... Hitler would be proud, because he did the same thing.

Speaking of which, Fidel Castro already IS proud.

And apparently he agrees with the liberal media: anyone who watches Fox News (and therefore opposes Obama) is paranoid and racist.

Call me crazy (or paranoid or racist), but when the former President of a communist nation praises your President, well, I think there might be reason for a bit of paranoia.

Apparently on the U.S.' long list of friends, among them terrorists and Hitler, we can now find Fidel Castro. Aren't we the popular ones.

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Libby Is At It Again

Libby (for Liberal) is my nickname for basically all the news networks besides Fox. You know, the liberally biased ones.

ABC and NBC have refused to air Anti-ObamaCare advertisements. Why? I have no idea. I guess they just don't want to have their viewers exposed to what Fox News viewers (the paranoid, racist ones) are exposed to. The truth.

I mean, I understand. The truth hurts. But euthanasia, abortion, liying and misleading governments, and the demise of a nation hurts worse. Ask all the other socialists, and especially ask the folks in Canada who have to wait four months (they're working on cutting it down to two) for an M.R.I.

Paranoid and Racist

According to MSNBC, anyone who watches Fox News is paranoid and racist.

Well.

Paranoid, no. Worried about the welfare of my country? Yeah. Sorry, I hadn't realized that that, too, is now a crime, right next to dissent. Legalize patriotism, jeez.

Racist? Any liberal who watches MSNBC and supports Planned Parenthood is racist, because Planned Parenthood was established to cut down on "impure" reproduction. A.K.A. African American and other races. There are people who would only donate money to the organization if their money was used to kill a black baby. And the organization was happy to comply.

Wait-- any good Conservative is likely to have watched Fox News, which was proven in a study to be the most balanced news network. Hmm. And don't Conservatives oppose Planned Parenthood? Does that mean they oppose a racist organization? Could it be? Heck yeah.

Fox News is the most balanced because it isn't filled with radical, sadistic lunatics. It focuses on facts and logic rather than letting emotion and bias affect it.

Anyway, NOW, in addition to being called racist, demented, racist, biased, racist, annoying, racist, misleading, racist, lying, and racist, I am now called paranoid and racist.

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

"Do It For Ted"

It makes me sick how the Dems don't even mourn Ted Kennedy for a full day and then they start insisting that we should pass healthcare reform "For Ted". "Do it for Ted" is apparently the new destruction-of-the-nation-one-bit-at-a-time slogan. He may have agreed with Obama, but if we "do it for Ted", someday he's going to look down on America and say, "Dang it. I see the truth now, but it's too late. America is socialist, quickly approaching communism. I should have done something. I thought I was doing the right thing, but I see it now. I wish America could have seen it, too."

Ted Kennedy worked hard to help our country, even though his policies were many a time misguided or lefty. So if the Dems aren't going to let him rest in freaking peace for one day without using his memory to promote their agenda, fine. I just have one more thing to say.

Ted Kennedy most likely sees things in perspective from where he is now. If he doesn't he'll be forced to watch his nation be destroyed. Either way, like I said, this is my final statement. Refuse ObamaCare (not all forms of reform, just the current one); do what's best for America, that's what he'd have wanted, regardless of whether he thought it would work while he was here. He'll see when America starts prospering again. Do it for America.

Do it for Ted.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

The Majority

From FOXNews.com (my comments are italicized)---Supporters of President Obama's plan to overhaul the health system, in an acknowledged attempt to reverse growing opposition to the plan, are planning a fusillade of rallies and bus tours starting this week.
Health Care for American Now, an umbrella organization of groups supporting Obama's plan, is coordinating its efforts with Organizing for America, the Obama campaign organization now melded into the national Democratic Party, which reputedly has an e-mail list of up to 13 million names.
From FOXNews.com--Supporters of President Obama's plan to overhaul the health system, in an acknowledged attempt to reverse growing opposition to the plan, are planning a fusillade of rallies and bus tours starting this week.
Health Care for American Now, an umbrella organization of groups supporting Obama's plan, is coordinating its efforts with Organizing for America, the Obama campaign organization now melded into the national Democratic Party, which reputedly has an e-mail list of up to 13 million names.
Together, they plan 1,000 events before the congressional recess ends September 8. The title for the blitz: "Health insurance reform now, let's get it done."

Defy the majority of America, increase debt, murder innocent people, ignore America now, let's get it done.

"We want to send members of Congress back to D.C. with the real message, which is that the majority of the public want comprehensive health care reform and we want it now," said Jacki Schechner, spokeswoman for HCAN.

36% of us support ObamaCare. 42% oppose it. Unless all my math teachers were wrong, 42 is more than 36. The majority of the public want comprehensive words from their leaders (not incoherent contradiction) and they want it now.

"We want to make sure members of Congress understand the last couple of weeks is not where the majority of the public is," said Schechner, referring to rowdy town hall meetings dominated by critics of the Democrats' plans.

No, the majority of the public agrees with those who disagree with ObamaCare, there just wasn't enough room for all the opposers at the meetings, so some stayed home. WE want to make sure that you understand that the majority of the public is fed up with this healthcare crap.

As conservative groups have organized against Democrats' health care legislation and cast it as a government takeover of health care, polls have shown fading public support for sweeping changes and skepticism over Obama's handling of the issue.

Well, it's a good thing the majority of the public still agrees with Obama, 'cause I was starting to worry that my Granny would make it and... oh... they figured him out already?

The events will mostly be large rallies, speeches and press conferences where the public will be invited to cheer or listen -- though not express the kind of opposition or ask the kinds of questions that have contributed to increased opposition to health care reform in many polls.
A nationwide DNC bus tour to spread the word starts Wednesday in Phoenix and continues through 10 more cities.

Yeah, no voicing any opposition. We wouldn't want anyone to think for a nanosecond that the majority of the public was really AGAINST ObamaCare.

Each city will include a big rally organized with the help of unions. DNC spokesman Brad Woodhouse said there will also be numerous large press conferences "in big public spaces" with lawmakers and people with individual health care stories the nation should hear.
Democrats say they held more than 500 town hall meetings in the first half of the congressional recess. Town halls will not be the main focus of the second half of the break, though they will continue and be organized nationally.
This would seem to be directly at odds with the general complaint among Democrats that some opposition to health care reform at town halls this summer has appeared to be organized. The attempted smear is they are not grassroots but "astroturf" -- a term that suggests that it was manufactured.
In fact the opposition has been organized at the grassroots level outside Washington, which is exactly what Democrats in Washington are now doing, with the help of labor unions, to push the pro-reform agenda.

Hypocrites. Well, at least you're doing the best thing for America, what the majority of Americans want...

HR 3200 Acrostic

H ugely
R idiculous,

T yrannical
H ealth
I nsurance
R ampage,
T esting
Y our

T hickheadedness
W ith
O utrageously

H orrible
U ntruth...
N ot
D oing
R eally
E xcellent
D eeds/Duty (its supporters aren't).

Are Short-Term "Advances" Caused by Long-Term Memory Loss?

My archnemesis, a liberal guy at my school, says, "Well, Obama may be giving us a fair amount of debt, but Bush gave us, like, all the debt we already had." Usually he has a more eloquent and sarcastic argument, and he's usually more well-informed (sadly). I didn't even bother arguing. Rationalizing to make the problem seem smaller is a common trick. So the following information, from heritage.org (I think the info is originally from the Washington Post and heritage.org just put it on their site) is dedicated to him.


-President Bush expanded the federal budget by a historic $700 billion through 2008. President Obama would add another $1 trillion.

-President Bush began a string of expensive finan­cial bailouts. President Obama is accelerating that course.

-President Bush created a Medicare drug entitle­ment that will cost an estimated $800 billion in its first decade. President Obama has proposed a $634 billion down payment on a new govern­ment health care fund.

-President Bush increased federal education spending 58 percent faster than inflation. Presi­dent Obama would double it.

-President Bush became the first President to spend 3 percent of GDP on federal antipoverty programs. President Obama has already in­creased this spending by 20 percent.

-President Bush tilted the income tax burden more toward upper-income taxpayers. President Obama would continue that trend.

-President Bush presided over a $2.5 trillion increase in the public debt through 2008. Setting aside 2009 (for which Presidents Bush and Obama share responsibility for an additional $2.6 trillion in public debt), President Obama’s budget would add $4.9 trillion in public debt from the beginning of 2010 through 2016.

Now, some people say that we got out of the Great Depression because of spending. Sure, it increased our debt and only lasted for a short period of time and ultimately, along with additional spending, led us to the crisis we have today, but still, it got us out, right? That's what I'm saying about short-term results. They don't work and eventually just make things worse.

Sorry to burst your bubbles, liberals.

Maybe the reason we keep making these short-term advances is because we have long-term memory loss and thus we can't learn from history.

Monday, August 24, 2009

What's Worse-- Ignorant Impropriety or Iniquitous Intent?

Which is worse? Not knowing you're doing wrong and doing it, or knowing you're doing wrong and doing it? I'd say the latter, but I don't know. You see, I've been trying to figure out whether Obama is trying to destroy America or whether he's just one of those people who goes in and wrecks everything on accident. It is really beyond my reasoning that he can think he's doing any amount of good. But then again, maybe it's possible. I've never met a lunatic before... much less had one run my country. This could get interesting.

I mean, he says, "It's going to cost two trillion dollars to exterminate the Granny population, but when it's all said and done, you'll thank me." And we're supposed to trust this wacko who wasted our future, and to do what? Kill our Grandmas and our children?

Gosh, I'm sorry. I've been saying that over and over and over and over some more. You must be getting tired of hearing me say "Grannies and babies" all the time. So let's talk about something else, like Obama's great impact on the economy, and what we predict for the future.

Wait-- what economy?

Financial Burdens and Objects

How many of you feel like life isn't worth living? Do you feel as though you are a financial burden on your family? Come on, does anyone even really want you around? Do you feel unloved or unwanted? If so, do us all a favor and die so healthcare can cost less.

Weird, huh? That's basically what senior citizens are going to be hearing if reform in healthcare is passed. I can see it now, Grannies across the country muttering, "I miss the good old days when you could have a stroke in peace."

And seriously. About the "financial burden" thing? They will literally ask questions like that. To a PERSON. We are treating PEOPLE as objects. Possessions.

If Obama doesn't understand, let me explain. A few hundred years ago, there was this really horrible thing going on. It is called slavery. Slavery was started because some people decided that other people weren't worth as much as they were, so they made them work torturous hours and gave them no pay and sometimes beat them. Slavery was ended because people are not objects. That is why enslaving the elderly and the unborn to our whims is not all right. This is discrimination.

Just imagine: my Grandma has a heart attack and survives. I am soooo glad. Then the governmeent comes in and convinces her to DIE. What the...? "Gee, Sarah, I'm so sorry. How'd she die?" my friends would ask. And I'd say, "HEALTH CARE KILLED HER."

How can you try convince a person to surrender their life for the greater good? That's inhumane! Kill yourself so... so what? How will we benefit from having all the old people euthanized? And how is it wrong to go into a war (a just war--not an unfair one) to protect your country with honor, but it is perfectly acceptable to be living a perfectly normal life as a stroke survivor and then have someone come along and convince you to die just because you had a change in condition?

Let me get this straight. I can't die for my country in a war, but I can die "for my country" just because I moved to a nursing home? And maybe they're convincing the elderly to die to give their grandkids a better life. Well, then, why aren't we convincing mothers to have babies so their kids can have a life? Less than 4% of abortions are cases of rape, incest, or serious medical issues. So there would be few women dying, especially if the doctors would try to save both the mom and the child. But no. I can't die for my children, I can't die for my country, but I can die for being a stroke survivor.

You know how they'll be asking the elderly if they are "financial burdens on their families"? Owe-bama, YOU are a financial burden on my family. Get out of the White House.

I have this Nobama sign in my room and occasionally I slap it when I'm really P.O.'d. Well, yesterday I slapped it and I said, "DIE!!!" Then I rephrased my words, because no matter how completely and totally idiotic and ignorant he is, I don't want him to die. So I said, "No, LIVE! Uh... somewhere ELSE!"

Sunday, August 23, 2009

Under the Reforms We Seek...

All he says is "under the reforms we seek" this and "under the reforms we seek" that. He has all but given up on gaining GOP leaders' support. Which means what?

Well, first of all, he's figured out that we are not backing down. Give the guy a prize.

Second, who's "we"? You and your band of stubborn liberals? What about America? Ever try listening to us? WE, the people?

But more importantly, it means that he will not listen to them. He gave up on gaining their support instead of listening to their ideas. His bill is the one that he is pushing through. The liberals are not going to listen to anyone else, so it's pretty obvious they won't get support from those whose ideas they refuse to consider.

Speaking of support...

This article is from FoxNews.com...

---If President Obama has his way, you'll soon be hearing about his health care package when you go to your church or synagogue to pray.
Thousands of religious leaders got a call from on high Wednesday when Obama reached out to Jewish and Christian clergy, urging them to push health care reform from the pulpit.
Obama spoke to about 140,000 people of faith in a conference call and webcast Wednesday evening. He and a White House official discussed the moral dimension of health care, telling the mostly Christian audience that "this debate over health care goes to the heart of who we are as a people."
But earlier that day, Obama went much further, asking about 1,000 rabbis to preach his political agenda in their sermons on Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year -- one of the holiest days of the year.
The conversation was supposed to be off the record but was captured on the Twitter feeds and blogs of some rabbis who took part in the call, which was organized by the Union of Reform Judaism and included rabbis from other denominations.
"I am going to need your help in accomplishing necessary reform," Obama said, according to Rabbi Jack Moline of Virginia, whose Twitter feed has since been scrubbed of the information.
Obama told the rabbis that "we are God's partners in matters of life and death" and asked them to "tell the stories of health care dilemmas to illustrate what is a stake" in their sermons, Moline wrote.
Critics say Obama's message seemed to "cross a line" and imply a kind of "scriptural or holy support for the program."
"I can't imagine why it would be appropriate for a president even to suggest a partnership with God somehow was connected to his ideas for health care," said the Rev. Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State.
"Whenever politicians give a message that implies that God is on their side on an issue ... this always troubles me."
A White House official told FOX News that Obama spoke at the invitation of the rabbis, who had many questions about health care. Current events often come up in sermons, the official said, and during the highly attended holidays many rabbis and congregants are likely to be interested in discussing the topic.
"We are not asking Rabbis to give a political lecture -- we don't expect everybody will want to hear sermons on health care," the official said.
Mark Pelavin, who organized the call from the Reform movement's Washington office, said the president talked about why the health care system needed to be fixed, but Pelavin declined to discuss Obama's specific remarks.
Pelavin, the associate director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, said his office organizes one or two such calls a year with experts and politicians to discuss issues of great interest to Jewish leaders, and health care was a natural topic.
Rabbis may choose to discuss health care in their sermons but will "stay away from partisan politics, but certainly they'll talk about issues that are facing the country," he told FOXNews.com.
But other rabbis present noted their discomfort with the president's message, and said they believed he was "using religious organizations to promote policy."
"I find the blurring of church and state to be disconcerting, not only on political grounds ... but also for competency," wrote Rabbi Josh Yuter of Manhattan, who was also on the call.
"Rabbis have enough difficulty understanding the nuances and intricacies of their own religion to be promoting specific policies in areas for which they have no expertise."
Lynn, of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said that although Obama is a religious man, he generally avoids emphasizing the religious basis for his decisions, adding he was disappointed that the president had "clouded this debate" with an underlying religious emphasis.
"This seems to, unfortunately, cross a line," he said.---

Is he really that desperate? Must he invade our church services, too? I am almost certain that my priest will not be participating in any kind of health care promotion.

He is trying to use the people many of us listen to to convince us of the awesomeness of his plan. All we are convinced of is his desperation.

God's partners?!? Um, I don't think God wants us to kill our grandparents and our children and allow our country to deescend to its demise. But I could be wrong. God gave us freedom of choice, so even if something is majorly wrong, we can still do it. Besides, how does he dare to insist that God is on his side? What if God is on our side? What if he's on Bigfoot's side? How does Obama know? Either he's really sure of himself or he's really worried about whether or not his bill will pass. I'm going with the latter.

This does more than cross a line. I never thought I'd see the day when, since he could not find enough support elsewhere, a President insinuated that his proposal was divine, sent by God, and turned to religious leaders for support.

But I guess there's a first time for everything.

Saturday, August 22, 2009

Obama's Address

Note: I was reading this address on Right-Wing Conspiracy, so I googled it and decided to comment on it myself. My comments are italicized.

OBAMA'S ADDRESS
Each and every day in this country, Americans are grappling with health care premiums that are growing three times the rate of wages and insurance company policies that limit coverage and raise out-of-pocket costs. Thousands are losing their insurance coverage each day.

Without real reform, the burdens on America’s families and businesses will continue to multiply. We’ve had a vigorous debate about health insurance reform, and rightly so. This is an issue of vital concern to every American, and I’m glad that so many are engaged.

But it also should be an honest debate, not one dominated by willful misrepresentations and outright distortions, spread by the very folks who would benefit the most by keeping things exactly as they are.

You're right, it should be an honest debate. But since you still hold the title of All-Time Hypocrite, it would be too much to ask for you to abide by your own words to us. You are the one weaving in and out of different opinions, confusing America. You are the one presenting outright distortions, either that or you have no clue what you're talking about, in which case you should resign immediately. We do not spread THE TRUTH because we are intent on keeping things the way they are, but because if we accept the "change" you are shoving up our noses, health care will become much worse. Currently, the majority of Americans like the system we have now, and polls show growing unease about your health care plan. We do need to make things better, and many Conservatives and Republicans have put forth ideas that you, for some reason, refuse to consider. If your goal was really to do what's best for America, wouldn't you consider suggestions from all Americans, no matter what their party?

So today, I want to spend a few minutes debunking some of the more outrageous myths circulating on the internet, on cable TV, and repeated at some town halls across this country.

So the opinions of those who oppose you are written off as myths because you want your outrageous bill passed? The truth is dismissed as folly because you are too intent on proving that you're right?

Let’s start with the false claim that illegal immigrants will get health insurance under reform. That’s not true. Illegal immigrants would not be covered. That idea has never even been on the table. Some are also saying that coverage for abortions would be mandated under reform. Also false. When it comes to the current ban on using tax dollars for abortions, nothing will change under reform. And as every credible person who has looked into it has said, there are no so-called “death panels” – an offensive notion to me and to the American people. These are phony claims meant to divide us.

I don't know why all the Dems are voting against an amendment that would prevent illegal immigrants from using the health care plan if the plan doesn't include immigrants. It's just hypocritical nonsense (Are you tired of me using the word "hypocritical" all of the time? I'm tired of having to use it, too). And if there are no death panels, then why did Ezekiel Emmanuel insist that we need a "priority curve" (a fancy term for "death panels) in our health plan? The fact that you think we're stupid enough to buy your health care plan is an offensive notion to the American people.

And we’ve all heard the charge that reform will somehow bring about a government takeover of health care. I know that sounds scary to many folks. It sounds scary to me, too. But here’s the thing: it’s not true. I no sooner want government to get between you and your doctor than I want insurance companies to make arbitrary decisions about what medical care is best for you, as they do today. As I’ve said from the beginning, under the reform we seek, if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your private health insurance plan, you can keep your plan. Period.

Then why did you say that you didn't think we could eliminate the public option immediately, but we could over time? And, um, you're a liberal. Aren't liberals socialist? And didn't I hear you say somethingabout a "government overhaul"...

Now, the source of a lot of these fears about government-run health care is confusion over what’s called the public option. This is one idea among many to provide more competition and choice, especially in the many places around the country where just one insurer thoroughly dominates the marketplace. This alternative would have to operate as any other insurer, on the basis of the premiums it collects. And let me repeat – it would be just an option; those who prefer their private insurer would be under no obligation to shift to a public plan.

Let me tell you why ther's a confusion over the public option. Actually, I don't have to tell you. All you need to do is to look at the things you've said in the past regarding the public option. And you'll see why we're CONFUSED. And, like Right-Wing Conspiracy states, if your public option is so great, people will switch to that. With the loss of customers, insurance companies will be forced to raise prices. And then those remaining in private insurance plans will leave, too. Finally, the private insurers will go bankrupt, and what you said wouldn't happen will, in fact, happen. I don't know why I'm telling you this, though. You would've known all along.

The insurance companies and their allies don’t like this idea, or any that would promote greater competition. I get that. And I expect there will be a lot of discussion about it when Congress returns.

They don't like the idea because they want to STAY IN BUSINESS!

But this one aspect of the health care debate shouldn’t overshadow the other important steps we can and must take to reduce the increasing burdens families and businesses face.

One aspect? What about death panels, illegal immigrants, and abortion?

So let me stress them again: If you don’t have insurance, you will finally have access to quality coverage you can afford. If you do have coverage, you will benefit from more security and more stability when it comes to your insurance. If you move, lose your job, or change jobs, you will not have to worry about losing health coverage. And we will set up tough consumer protections that will hold insurance companies accountable and stop them from exploiting you with unfair practices.

We’ll prohibit insurance companies from denying coverage because of a person’s medical history. They will not be able to drop your coverage if you get sick. They will not be able to water down your coverage when you need it most. They will no longer be able to place some arbitrary cap on the amount of coverage you can receive in a given year or a lifetime. We’ll place a limit on how much you can be charged for out-of-pocket expenses, because no one in America should go broke because they get sick.

And we will require insurance companies to cover routine checkups and preventive care, like mammograms and colonoscopies. There’s no reason we shouldn’t be catching diseases like breast cancer and colon cancer on the front end. That makes sense, it saves lives, and it will also save money over the long-run. Taken together, the reforms we’re seeking will help bring down skyrocketing costs, which will mean real savings for families, businesses, and government.

We know what a failure to act would bring: More of the same. More of the same exploding costs. More of the same diminished coverage. If we fail to act, the crisis will grow. More families will go without coverage. More businesses will be forced to drop or water down their plans.

You're right. But if we act in the way you plan to, things won't stay the same. They'll get worse. Listen to your people.

So we can push off the day of reckoning and fail to deal with the flaws in the system, just as Washington has done, year after year, decade after decade. Or we can take steps that will provide every American family and business a measure of security and stability they lack today.

It has never been easy, moving this nation forward. There are always those who oppose it, and those who use fear to block change. But what has always distinguished America is that when all the arguments have been heard, and all the concerns have been voiced, and the time comes to do what must be done, we rise above our differences, grasp each others’ hands, and march forward as one nation and one people, some of us Democrats, some of us Republicans, all of us Americans.

You're right. It never has been easy, because there are all these liberal political leaders in the way. All the arguments have been heard, maybe, but not listened to. My mom used to tell me there was a difference. I was really not interested in the lecture she was giving, and she could tell. "Are you listening?" she'd ask. "I hear you," I'd reply. "There's a difference," she'd tell me. "You can hear music in the background, but pausing to listen to the words and the different instruments is different from just hearing it." Are we just background noise to you, Mr. President? Or have all the arguments been LISTENED TO, all concerns voiced? And if we are all Americans, how come you express doubt that a bi-partisan compromise can be reached? Are we that hopelessly lost to you? Or are we just informed?

This is our chance to march forward. I cannot promise you that the reforms we seek will be perfect or make a difference overnight. But I can promise you this: if we pass health insurance reform, we will look back many years from now and say, this was the moment we summoned what’s best in each of us to make life better for all of us. This was the moment when we built a health care system worthy of the nation and the people we love. This was the moment we earned our place alongside the greatest generations. And that is what our generation of Americans is called to do right now.

If we pass reform (yours) now, we'll look back years from now and say, "Gol dang it, if he hadn't passed that stupid reform, I wouldn't be sitting here waiting to get RATIONALIZED!"

I know what my generation is called to do right now. I'm doing it RIGHT NOW, by clicking "PUBLISH POST"!!!

Spending Your Money in an Attempt To Sell the Healthcare Plan NOBODY WANTS

The government is obviously desperate to convince America that it needs government intervention. They hired (hired as in paid, with your taxpayer dollars) a private communications company called Govdelivery to send mass emails proclaiming the almighty infallibility of the government and their wonderful, divine healthcare plan. So you ended up paying for an email you don't want. Jeez. You'd think they weren't THAT intent on force-feeding their sickeningly mad healthcare plan to the unwilling American population. But once again, we underestimated them.

Maybe America would be less unwilling (the liberal percentage, at least, would be) if Obama would stop flip-flopping and at least put a greater effort into pretending to actually know what he's talking about. Oh, well, I guess his well of deception has temporarily run dry. But don't give up hope, poor liberals, those who thirst for power, money, and the elimination of unborn children and Grannies everywhere. I'm sure he'll soon be back on his feet. Not really. Why?

Well, most of America opposes his healthcare plan, because, strange as it may seem, they value human life and they value America. They value their children and they value their Grandmas and they value their families and don't want them ripped apart by TWO TRILLION DOLLARS of more debt loaded on them over the next ten years, the time in which their children may hopefully be entering college. They want their families to thrive in this wonderful land known as America, land of the free (not the debt-saturated and debt-captive) and home of the brave (not those who cower before the government). They want their children to grow up healthy and grow old and die naturally, and to have children, and keep their families alive. Keep America alive. They want to live in a nation that strives for the best, with people free to speak and write what they believe. They want to live in a capitalist country, the last superpower from World War Two. They want to stay the powerful country they are, not have America's position waning as a result of our slow regression into socialism. They want their families to enjoy and love and cherish and fight for and thrive in AMERICA. If Obama is baffled as to why America isn't offering him the popularity they once were, it's as simple as that.

I was watching Fox News this morning, and some girl whose name I didn't catch was promoting the healthcare plan. When asked to relate a time when such government intervention has worked before, she replied, "I'm not a historian." Well, if she's so sure she's right, she'll need evidence to back up her conviction. She doesn't have to be a historian; she just needs to know what she's talking about. Which she doesn't, as evidenced by her further insistence that "there's a first time for everything." Oh, my gosh. I'm supposed to hand over my trust, money, healthcare, and Grandma to my ever-misguided government because "there's a first time for everything"?!?!?

No, thank you. I'll keep my country and my family and my health out of their paws. If the only guarantee that they're doing something right is that "there's a first time for everything", and this just might be that time, then the crazy struggle for a socialist healthcare overhaul is even more pitiful than I imagined. Here's a little script to help you visualize the overwhelming stupidity of this whole mess.

MR. DAWSWORTH: But, sir, many have tried, but all have failed. No one has ever made an anti-human-puncturing knife before. You say it knows human skin and pulls in its blade before contact, but have you ever tested it? Has it worked before?

DR. CAMBRIDGE: Well, that's why I have you. You'll be my first victim, er, subject. You are going to prove my invention's worth to the world!

MR. DAWSWORTH (sweating nervously): Um...

DR. CAMBRIDGE: Great! Just stand there.

MR. DAWSWORTH: How do you know it'll work if it's never worked before?

DR. CAMBRIDGE: There's a first time for everything! (throws knife) Oh, dear... This could prove to be most problematic.

Get the idea? Oh, sure, it's never worked before, but since there's a first time for everything, let's plot our demise more certainly on the coordinate plane of life.

"I'm too young to die!" America is screaming. Well, except for the elderly, who wait in fear of the death panels. They say,

"We're too old to die! Respect your elders!"

Has anyone ever heard of such a despicable mass Holocaust aimed only at the elderly? I've heard of murdering the unborn for no legitimate reason whatsoever, but now we're killing their grandparents? Has a nation ever destroyed itself one level at a time, murdering those they deem worthless until there is no one left? I don't think that's ever happened, but there's a first time for everything.